However, the findings related to the secondary maximum modulation depth and its potential comparable strength to the primary maximum, especially when electric field vectors are misaligned, could potentially lead to a “model drift”. This highlights a previously unnoticed aspect of TI stimulation that could have implications for optimizing and interpreting the results of TI EBS. It suggests a possible refinement or adjustment of the existing models to account for this secondary maximum and its influence on neuromodulation outcomes. While not a "model crisis" yet, this finding warrants further investigation and could lead to adjustments in current practices or assumptions about TI EBS.
Given the above, classifying this preprint as purely “normal science” or “model drift” is difficult. The work is refining current models and providing new tools which fits "normal science" but these refinements also bring to light previously unknown implications, pointing towards "model drift."
}