1. Articulating a problem within the accepted paradigm: The slow and manual process of content ideation in digital journalism, contrasted with the need for speed and efficiency.
2. Proposing a solution based on established tools and techniques: Leveraging readily available APIs and agile development methodologies.
3. Evaluating the solution's effectiveness within the paradigm's framework: Measuring time savings, workflow improvements, and user feedback, aligning with the paradigm's values of speed and efficiency.
While IDEIA leverages cutting-edge AI technologies, its primary contribution lies in applying these within the existing paradigm of digital journalism, optimizing established practices rather than fundamentally challenging them. Hence, the classification as "Normal Science" is deemed most appropriate. There is a subtle nuance of model drift, which could be considered a secondary classification. By introducing AI-driven automation into the editorial workflow, IDEIA potentially initiates a shift in practices, potentially leading to further development and refinement of journalistic processes. However, as the study focuses primarily on enhancing current workflows, the dominant characteristic remains aligned with "normal science".